I don’t remember the names of all the instruments in the surgical tray. I swear they have a unique name for each size of the same instrument. Hemostats- crile, snap, stat, mosquito, tonsil, Kelly, Rochester Pean. There is a laundry list of pickups of different shapes with different teeth. And then throw in the culture of different hospitals and specialties. When you place a Bookwalter and you want the short wide curved retractor…do you call it a bladder blade or a curved body wall? And the straight one…is that a Rich or a body wall? In case you’re wondering, the curved retractor is called a Balfour and the straight retractor is called a Kelly. When you’re doing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, do you ever ask for a wavy grasper or do you call it a prestige? Or something else altogether? As I resident and attending, I used a wavy grasper. Check out the picture. Doesn’t it look like…a wavy? When I was in fellowship, the same instrument was called a prestige. Sounds unnecessarily boastful to me, but whatever. After 9 years using a wavy, it was hard to break the habit and call it a prestige. Thankfully, the scrubs knew what I wanted. I found out it's actually called a Prestige Style Atraumatic Wavy Grasper, so it turns out, we are both right. But that would take way too long to say each time you want to grasp the infundibulum.

As we move through training, we develop routines, including our favorite instruments to use during different steps of the operation. When surgeons and scrub techs spend time together during cases, they frequently develop a rhythm, a shorthand. A good scrub tech knows what you want before you even ask. I have had the fortunate of developing several relationships like this. My favorite scrub tech was Kelly. She was a fantastic tech, but also a fantastic person. And the joke of asking for Kelly Kelly never got old. After years of working together, she understood my style and my technique, and always had my next instrument ready. To be honest, it didn’t take years. She knew what I wanted, even if I asked for the wrong thing. She was an invaluable asset to the team, and I miss working in the OR with her.

As I mentioned, I don’t remember the names of all the instruments in the surgical tray. A good scrub tech gives you what you want, not what you ask for. While operating, I often extend my hand toward my scrub tech, and as I’m trying to come up with the right name, I start to make gestures with my fingers. Fingers posed like holding a pencil signals scalpel. Thumb and index finger pinched together is my gesture for pickups. Index and middle finger in an open/close motion indicate scissors. Curved fingers, like holding a cup, means I want a retractor. And I request a needle driver by holding the scalpel pose and moving my wrist through a suturing motion.

There have been many innovations brought about by the COVID pandemic, and I predict that business will never be conducted the same as before this era. The protective gear worn to prevent viral transmission negatively impacts team communication. This was one of the summary findings of a survey of surgeons, recently published in the World Journal of Surgery.(1) The impact on speech discrimination has been quantified in an experiment with a simulated noisy background.(2) Google “communication impediment COVID protective equipment” and you will encounter many publications regarding the unintended consequences of interventions designed to keep health care personnel safer. Before the pandemic, we already operated wearing masks, which eliminates some of the visual cues of communication. But novel respirators can add several hindrances, including restricting normal jaw movement and muffling the spoken word. The use of the PAPR (powered air-purifying respirator) added a whole new dimension- noise from the fan and battery adds a remarkable hurdle when the surgical team is trying to communicate with other members of the operating team.

Admittedly my system is imperfect, and I think a universal sign language for the operating room is a brilliant concept. A proposed system was recently published in the British Journal of Surgery.(3) Signals were developed to request a scalpel, various retractors, forceps, needle drivers, and gauze. This concept is logical, although admittedly, I have become increasingly reticent to accept any innovation just because it appears simple and absent of downsides. Consider the intubation boxes that were developed to prevent aerosol dissemination early in the pandemic. The concept was rational- solid barrier to isolate the patient, great idea! But during simulation, there were multiple hurdles- largely, it makes difficult intubation more challenging, which potentially defeats the purpose by increasing maneuvers and personnel and time to successful intubation. To quote one review: “Well-designed simulations…should always be used to test medical innovations before implementation... “Face validity” alone should not be the basis of innovation adoption.”(4)

Is a new language necessary?

Do we really need a system to talk to the tech, who is standing closer to us than anyone else in the room, and probably already knows what we want? They are more focused on exactly what is going on in the operative field than anyone else, and they can lean closer or ask us to repeat our request. We need a better way to talk to everyone else in the room! The anesthesiologist who is balancing multiple tasks and the OR nurse who is at least several steps away from the surgeon.

What are the potential roadblocks or negative consequences associated with implementation?

·  Potential for misinterpretation of signals…someone is expecting a pickup and they’re handed a scalpel, which is quickly brought into the field and creates an injury.

·  The inability of the surgeon to create the signal if both hands are working.

·  If verbal communication is eliminated, the tech has to constantly watch the surgeons hands, which prevents them from doing other manual tasks, such as loading clip appliers, returning needles to the count box, receiving freshly opened materials from the scrub nurse, etc

After all that, I’m not rendering a final verdict. This is an innovative and intriguing concept with a lot of potential. It should be considered and trialed while ensuring that its benefits outweigh the negative impacts before wide-spread implementation.

1. Yánez Benítez C et al. Impact of Personal Protective Equipment on Surgical Performance During the COVID-19 Pandemic. World J Surg. 2020 Sep;44(9):2842-2847.

2. Hampton T et al. The negative impact of wearing personal protective equipment on communication during coronavirus disease 2019. J Laryngol Otol. 2020 Jul;134(7):577-581.

3. Leyva-Moraga FA et al. Effective surgical communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: sign language. Br J Surg. 2020;107(10):e429-430

4. Chan A. Should we use an “aerosol box” for intubation? Life in the Fast Lane. 2020 Jul. https://litfl.com/should-we-use-an-aerosol-box-for-intubation/