Search
197 results found with an empty search
- Chicken Enchiladas in Sour Cream Sauce | Doc on the Run
< Back Chicken Enchiladas in Sour Cream Sauce Ingredients 10 small soft flour tortillas 3 Tbsp flour 2 c chicken broth 1 c sour cream 2.5 c shredded cooked chicken 3 c shredded Monterey Jack cheese 3 Tbsp butter 4 oz can diced green chillies Instructions 1. Preheat oven to 350 degrees 2. Combine shredded chicken and 1 cup of cheese. Fill tortillas with the mixture above and roll each one then place in a greased 9x13 pan. 3. Melt butter in a pan over medium heat. Stir flour into butter and whisk for 1 minute over heat. 4. Add broth and whisk together. Cook over heat until it's thick and bubbles up 5. Take off heat and add in sour cream and chilies. Be careful it's not too hot or the sour cream will curdle. 6. Pour mixture over enchiladas and add remaining cheese to top. 7. Bake in oven for 20-23 minutes then you will want to broil for 3 minutes to brown the cheese. The roux, with sour cream and green chilies added Previous Enchiladas covered with sauce Cooked and broiled to brown the cheese Next
- Book Review: Scienceblind | Doc on the Run
14 Scienceblind Why Our Intuitive Theories About the World Are So Often Wrong Intuitive theories- our best guess as to why we observe the events we do and how we can intervene in those events to change them. Infer causality from our observations. Similar to historical theories- how we used to understand things before we had the ability to understand the reality (like heat as an “object” versus “energy”). Emergent process- system wide (no clear cause/ effect explanation), equilibrium-seeking, simultaneous, ongoing. Heat, weather, evolution are all emergent processes. Molecular theory, scientific theory. Holistic theory- matter is continuous and has heft and bulk Intuitive theories of the physical world Matter- substances are holistic and discrete, instead of particulate and divisible. Conservation- clay flattened, water poured from short fat glass to tall skinny glass. The difference between weight and heft, volume and bulk? Energy- heat, light and sound viewed as substance instead of emergent property. Why can you touch the 400 degree air in the oven but not the pan itself (without oven mitts)? The pan transfers heat better than air. How do we change from viewing “sound” as an “object” to viewing it as “energy”? First, we stop attributing permanence (noise doesn’t continue forever), then weight (clock doesn’t become lighter with each chime) and then mass (noise can pass through a wall, doesn’t have to maneuver around wall). Extra-missionist- rays go out of the eye and then return to create vision vs intro-missionist- rays enter the eye to create vision. Gravity- weight is an intrinsic property of objects instead of relation between mass and gravity. Objects don’t fall because they’re heavy- they fall when they don’t have upward force on them that exceeds gravity (center of gravity). Motion- force is something transferred between objections (“impetus”), instead of external factor changing the objects motion. What path will an object take- for example, a ball in a spiral slide- takes straight path after exiting, doesn’t gain an inherent “spiral” motion. Cosmos- earth is a motionless plane orbited by the sun. Changing of the tides, seasons (tilt of the earth as it revolves around the sun, the side closest to the sun is summer). Earth- continents and mountains are eternal and unchanging vs transient/ dynamic. Tectonic plates- similar land features on different coasts. Greenhouse effect and global warming- humans causing it, but the earth will live beyond us. Vitalism- living things possess an internal energy, or life force, that allows those things to move and to grow. Essentialism is the idea that an organism’s outward appearance and behavior are products of its inner nature, or “essence.” Intuitive theories of the biological world Life- animals viewed as psychological agents vs organic machines. Death= cessation of biological processes. Growth- eating is for satiation rather than nourishment, aging is a series of discrete changes vs continuous change. Vitalism- living things possess an internal energy, or life force, that allows those things to move and to grow. Essentialism is the idea that an organism’s outward appearance and behavior are products of its inner nature, or “essence.” Inheritance- parent-offspring resemblance viewed as nurture, vs transfer of genetic information. Illness- disease is due to supernatural causes, instead of microorganisms. Adaptation- evolution is the transformation of an entire population (butterflies become slightly darker with each generation) vs selective survival (darker butterflies survive to reproduce). Ancestry- species develop linearly (monkey→ ape→ human) rather than branching from common ancestor. Previous Next
- Medical Literature | Doc on the Run
Medical Literature Evidence-Based Medicine After you have established a firm foundation of the basics of your chosen specialty, you're ready to develop regular habits to stay up to date on the newest research. Evidence-based medicine is the basis of high-quality patient care, but it can seem overwhelming to try to keep up with the ever-growing body of research. There are countless journals, and it would be time-consuming to search them regularly. So how does one go about navigating the vast ocean of available data? Registering for email alerts is a simple way to get notified when there are new publications. With a quick skim through the article titles to see if anything is relevant, followed by a review of the abstract/ article itself, you can be on the cutting edge of the latest information in your field. Several require individual registration, but it's a very simple and quick process. Many journals require a subscription, often available through your medical school or hospital library. If you are military, you have access to AMEDD Virtual Library (abundant medical resource collection). Thankfully, three publishers (LWW Wolters Kluwer , Springer and Elsevier ) have centralized their journals, so you can quickly subscribe to several journals [these journals are designated by L, S or E]. Medicine and Critical Care Journal of the Ameri can Medical Association New England Journal of Medicine Intensive Care Medicine Critical Care Medicine (L) Current Opinions in Critical Care (L) Journal of Intensive Care (S) Critical Care (S) Journal of Critical Care (E) Critical Care Clinics (E) Surgery World Journal of Surgery World Journal of GI Surgery JAMA Surgery J Gastrointestinal Surg Advances in Surgery Annals of Surgery (L) Annals of Surgery Open (L) BMC Surgery (S) Surgery (E) American Journal of Surgery (E) Journal of the American College of Surgeons (E) Surgical Clinics of North America (E) Advances in Surgery (E) Trauma and Emergency Surgery European J Trauma and Emergency Surgery Trauma Surgery and Acute Care Open Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (L) World Journal of Emergency Surgery (S) World Neurosurgery (E) Other Specialities Journal of Neurotrauma World Journal of Cardiology JAMA Cardiology JAMA Neurology JAMA Network Open Anesthesia and Analgesia (L) Current Opinion in Anesthesiology (L) Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition (L) Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases (L) Current Opinion in Neurology (L) Diseases of the Colon and Rectum (L) Journal of the American College of Cardiology (E)
- Mentorship | Doc on the Run
< Back Mentorship What is mentorship? Mentorship is a partnership between a more experienced and knowledgeable individual (mentor) and a less experienced individual (mentee) seeking to learn, develop skills, and advance their career in the healthcare profession. The mentor is typically someone who has achieved a level of success that the mentee aspires to reach. Through this relationship, the mentee, who could be a medical student, trainee (resident or fellow), or junior staff member, can benefit from the mentor's expertise and past experiences, gaining valuable insights into the healthcare profession. The mentor can serve as an advisor, consultant, or coach depending on the mentor's expertise and the mentee's needs. For example, a mentorship relationship can be designed to help the mentee improve clinical skills, navigate the job search process, or advance research endeavors. It's common to have different mentors for different purposes, as each mentor may have different strengths. Mentorship also provides networking opportunities, as the mentor can facilitate connections between the mentee and other professionals in the field. In summary, mentorship is a valuable tool for professional development in healthcare, offering guidance, support, and connections that can help mentees achieve their goals. Do I really need a mentor? Throughout medical school and residency, I didn't have any formal mentors, but I did actively seek the opinions, advice, and feedback of several surgeons I respected. As a young staff surgeon, I still didn't actively pursue mentorship, though I now recognize that it could have been highly beneficial. My first formal mentorship relationship was late in my training, when I was an Acute Care Surgery fellow and I was required to choose a staff member as a mentor. It's not uncommon for trainees to lack mentors, and one possible explanation resonates with me. "Many young people today who end up in residency…have been on a fast track. They’re essentially high-achieving, highly driven professional students who have been on a fairly regimented pathway…and they haven’t reached a point where there are multiple pathways they could take."(1) As someone who has been on a straight path since high school, progressing from high school to medical school to residency to being a junior faculty, I potentially missed out on a valuable asset. It's important to note that having a mentor is not a requirement, but developing a strong relationship with a mentor can positively influence one's success. It's highly recommended that individuals consider formal mentorship, but it's equally important to recognize that they have the ability to end relationships that are toxic or not a good fit. How do I find a mentor? Mentorship relationships can be an essential aspect of professional growth for medical trainees. These relationships can develop organically or be assigned by program directors in residency or fellowship programs. If you are assigned a mentor, it can be a great experience, but it is also possible that you may not mesh well if the assignment was not carefully considered. It's essential to recognize that if you find yourself in a mentor-mentee relationship that is not productive, amicable, or beneficial, it's okay to end the relationship and seek out another mentor. On the other hand, organic mentorship relationships can also be incredibly fruitful. As you work with various individuals in different settings, such as the operating room, during rounds, or while discussing consults, you will begin to form opinions and may find that you gravitate towards a particular person. If you respect and trust them and they demonstrate skills or expertise that you want to learn from, they might be a viable option as a mentor. The process of finding a mentor can be as simple as asking the person you would like to work with if they would be willing to mentor you. Remember, the worst they can do is say no, so it's worth taking the risk to ask. If they don't have the time to commit to being a mentor, they may be able to connect you with someone else who could be a good fit. It's important to recognize that mentorship relationships require effort from both the mentor and the mentee. While your mentor can offer guidance, support, and feedback, it's ultimately up to you to take ownership of your own professional development. Be clear about your goals, seek out feedback, and be receptive to constructive criticism. By putting in the work, you can make the most of your mentorship relationship and set yourself up for success in your career. Finding a mentor can be a great way to help you achieve your personal and professional goals, but it's important to have a plan in place to make the most of the relationship. Here are some steps you can take after finding a mentor to ensure that you get the most out of the relationship: 1. Set specific goals: Take some time to think about what you hope to gain from your mentorship. Are you looking to improve your skills in a particular area? Do you want help navigating a career transition? By setting specific goals, you can make sure that you and your mentor are on the same page and working towards the same objectives. 2. Establish communication: Once you've set your goals, it's important to establish how you will communicate with your mentor and how frequently you will meet. This can be done through formal meetings, phone calls, or casual chats over coffee. Make sure that both you and your mentor are comfortable with the frequency and type of communication. 3. Complete assignments or tasks: Your mentor may assign you tasks or provide you with guidance on specific projects. It's important to take these assignments seriously and complete them as directed. This could be anything from revising your CV to drafting a study protocol. By following through on these tasks, you can demonstrate your commitment to the mentorship and make progress towards your goals. 4. Reassess and refine: As you work with your mentor, it's important to regularly reassess your progress and refine your goals. This may involve checking off completed tasks, adding new objectives, or removing items that are no longer a priority. By keeping your goals current and relevant, you can make sure that you are making the most of the mentorship. Overall, finding a mentor can be an incredibly valuable experience. By taking the time to set goals, establish communication, complete assignments, and reassess your progress, you can make sure that you get the most out of the relationship and achieve your personal and professional objectives. 1. Darves B. Physician Mentorship: Why It’s Important, and How to Find and Sustain Relationships. NEJM Career Center. 2018 Feb. Previous Next
- Acute Care Surgery | Doc on the Run
3 < Back Acute Care Surgery Clinical Guidelines EAST Practice Management Guidelines. Evidence-based guidelines developed and published by EAST. Covers EGS, ICU, trauma, and injury prevention. SurgicalCriticalCare.Net . Evidence-based guidelines from Orlando Regional Medical Center. Vanderbilt Trauma and Surgical Critical Care Practice Management Guidelines. Evidence-based guidelines developed by Vanderbilt. Covers trauma and surgical critical care topics. Evidence-Based Decisions in Surgery. This does require membership with the American College of Surgeons. General Medical Information UpToDate. The name says it all- evidence-based recommendations based on the most current literature. Subscription required. Previous Next
- Tutorial: Ultrasound: Thoracic Exam | Doc on the Run
< Back Ultrasound: Thoracic Exam Purpose: evaluate for etiology of respiratory failure- pleural fluid collections, pneumothorax, infiltrate, pulmonary edema. Probe Linear for visualization of superficial structures- for example, the pleural interface to evaluate for lung sliding Curvilinear or phased array for the remainder of the lung Findings A and B Lines A-lines- *normal finding*. Hyperechoic arcs parallel to the pleural line. These are seen at intervals that are the same as the interval from the skin to the pleural line. Absence of A lines= change in attenuation coefficient of the lung (edema, consolidation). B-lines- vertical hyperechoic lines, caused by fluid-filled intra-lobular or interlobular septa touching the visceral pleural surface. Examples: cardiogenic pulm edema, ALI, ARDS, pneumonia, ILD or pulm fibrosis, pulm contusion. Comet tail artifact- *normal finding*. Arise from the pleural line and only extend 2-4 cm deep before fading (unlike B lines). They mean that the pleura are in contact. Pleural sliding Shimmering of the hyperechoic pleura→ pleura are in contact. No sliding→ concerning for PTX. There are clinical conditions other than PTX that result in a lack of lung sliding: Effusion, inflammatory adhesions, (pneumonia, ALI), pleurodesis, interstitial or fibrotic lung disease, pleural disease, apnea, severe hyperinflation (asthma, COPD), artifact (subQ air). M mode- sliding→ seashore. No sliding→ barcode. Lung pulse - cardiac motion causes the two pleura to slide Lung point - the junction between the edge of the pneumothorax and the normal lung, where the pleural surfaces meet. One side is sliding and the other side isn’t. Consolidation Air bronchograms- air in small aerated patches of the consolidated lung, or the small bronchi. Dynamic- bubbles move in and out with each breath- no complete bronchial obstruction, more likely true consolidation vs atelectasis. Pneumonia- advanced consolidation (air is completely replaced with fluid)→ lung appear to have a liver-like echogenicity (hepatization) Diaphragm - evaluate diaphragm contraction and thickness. Effusions Spine sign- the presence of a large effusion allowing visualization of the spine. Normally the air in the lung prevents visualization of the spine above the level of the diaphragm, but sound waves can pass through the fluid. Plankton sign- floating debris in an effusion that swirl with pulm or cardiac motion→ blood/ fibrin suggestive of HTX/ exudate Jellyfish sign- consolidated or compressed lung is floating in the pleural fluid. Common Pathologies with their associated ultrasound findings PTX- no lung sliding, M-mode barcode sign, lung point sign, A-lines from intact parietal pleura Pulmonary edema- B lines, normal lung sliding, +/- effusions ARDS- B lines, normal lung sliding References Lung Ultrasound Made Easy: Step-By-Step Guide Lee FC. Lung ultrasound-a primary survey of the acutely dyspneic patient. J Intensive Care. 2016 Aug 31;4(1):57. Previous Next
- Textbooks | Doc on the Run
1 < Back Textbooks General Surgery: Scientific Foundations Sabiston Textbook of Surgery: The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice. 21st Edition, 2021. This is the detailed explanation of the science behind the practice of surgery. This is the basic science textbook I used during residency. Mulholland and Greenfield's Surgery: Scientific Principles & Practice. Previously known as "Greenfields". General Surgery: Beyond Basic Science Cameron's Current Surgical Therapy. 13th edition, 2019. Short chapters with high-yield information on every topic in General Surgery. Must-have for later in residency. Trauma Mattox Trauma. 9th edition, 2021. The trauma surgery bible. Highly recommend. Critical Care Marino ICU. 4th edition, 2013. The ICU bible. Highly recommend. Civetta, Taylor, & Kirby's Critical Care Medicine. 5th edition, 2017. A detailed explanation of physiology, diagnosis, and management. Finks Critical Care. 7th edition, 2017. Slightly less detailed than Civetta. Excellent book- not too simplistic and not painfully detailed. Evidence-Based Practice of Critical Care. 3rd edition, 2019. Reviews the literature regarding specific high yield critical care topics. Surgical Critical Care Therapy: A Clinically Oriented Practical Approach. 1st edition, 2018. Essentials of Mechanical Ventilation. 4th edition, 2018. Previous Next
- Why Don't They Believe Us? | Doc on the Run
[Editorial inspired by @kari_jerge] Why Don't They Believe Us? < Back [Editorial inspired by @kari_jerge] Seen on Twitter recently: Troll: I demand pictures of your full ICU to prove to me it’s full Female surgeon: None of us owes you a damn thing. Especially not pictures that will get us fired. But I’ll get right on that… What do you do if you accidentally injure yourself while working or making home improvements? Do you call 911 or have someone drive you to the ER? What do you do if you have high blood pressure, or diabetes, or depression? Do you go to a primary care doctor? What do you do if you have severe arthritic hip pain that doesn't resolve with conservative (non-operative) management? Do you consider talking to an orthopedic surgery about a hip replacement? I don't know what portion of the population inherently trust the medical community, but for the remainder of this editorial, I will presume that it's a majority. For those that don't, this doesn't apply. If you don't trust modern medicine, I won't convince you that you should trust our reports about this pandemic. Let's assume you accept modern medicine, including visiting the emergency department, having a primary care doctor, taking prescription medicine, and any of the other various diagnostic tests, consultations, and treatments. If this is the case, why would you think we would voluntarily try to deceive you about the capacity and occupancy of our ICU facilities? Why would so many medical community leaders actively speak out with a nearly singular voice to spread a lie? Ranging from the widely known Dr. Sanjay Gupta to a wide assortment of medical providers in many specialties. We have nothing to gain from building this whole façade. This isn't just a few people speaking up. This is a monumental effort to warn people. Social media has given a voice- and many have worked very hard to dispel the myths spread by many loud voices that continue to spread falsehoods. We have nothing to gain. You trust us to save your life when you have a heart attack, need emergency surgery, or care for you when you're severely ill from any matter of diseases. We haven't changed as a community to collectively spread these myths. It really is as bad as we say. We genuinely don't get paid more for patients who die from COVID. We don't have adequate PPE. We aren't lying. If you continue to deny reality, we will still care for you or your family and friends, in the unfortunate case you become ill, because that's what we do. We are just hoping that we will have the resources you need. And if we stretch our personnel any thinner, we will not have enough nurses and providers to care for you. We are the last hope. Don't make choices you'll regret. Previous Next
- Vignette: Abdominal Pain- Mesenteric Ischemia | Doc on the Run
< Back Abdominal Pain- Mesenteric Ischemia A 65-year-old male with 1 week of progressive abdominal pain presented to a small hospital. His medical history is significant for a myelofibrosis with chronic portal vein thrombosis. He underwent CT scan and was urgently transferred to the surgical ICU at the nearby tertiary hospital. CT abdomen and pelvis (coronal) CT abdomen and pelvis (axial) The abdomen pelvis CT showed chronic portal vein thrombosis with cavernous transformation as well as distal SMV thrombosis with inflammatory changes of the distal small bowel. There is a moderate amount of intra-abdominal fluid, including around the spleen and liver as well as in the pelvis. There is thickening of the small bowel wall as well as stranding and edema in the mesentery. There was also evidence of a splenorenal shunt. Representative slice from CT, axial Representative slice from CT, axial- labels Representative slice from CT, axial Representative slice from CT, axial- labels Differential diagnosis? Splenic injury secondary to splenomegaly (minor trauma can lead to splenic injury in the setting of splenomegaly). Bowel ischemia. Hollow viscus perforation. On arrival to the ICU, his abdominal exam revealed diffuse rebound tenderness. He became disoriented during our interview. Concurrent with our evaluation, the images with reviewed with radiology who reported that the fluid was not consistent with hemoperitoneum from a splenic injury. Based on our concern for bowel ischemia, he was taken to the operating room for abdominal exploration. He was noted to have a significant length of ischemic and necrotic bowel. This was resected and his bowel was left in discontinuity. He was returned to the ICU with an open abdomen and plan for second look laparotomy within 24 hours. Evaluation and Management of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia Causes Arterial Embolism- from the left atria (atrial fibrillation), left ventricle (decreased function following cardiac ischemia) or heart valves. Arterial Thrombosis- progression of underlying atherosclerotic disease leading to critical stenosis at the takeoff of the celiac or SMA from the aorta. Venous Thrombosis- hypercoagulable states, acute inflammatory process around the SMV (pancreatitis), post-operative following splenectomy or bariatric surgery. Non-occlusive mesenteria ischemia (NOMI)- low-flow through the SMA with vasoconstriction. Often having underying illness or cardiac failure, which is exacerbated by vasoconstrictive medications and hypovolemia. Presentation Severe abdominal pain, "pain out of proportion to exam" (report severe pain but abdominal exam doesn't elicit tenderness). Arterial thrombosis may be acute on chronic, if there is underlying chronic mesenteric ischemia. Diagnosis Etiology can be suspected based on symptoms and medical/ surgical history. Sudden onset is suggestive of arterial embolism. Known hypercoagulable state is suggestive of venous thrombosis. Chronic abdominal symptoms including pain with eating (food fear) and weight loss are suggestive of arterial thrombosis. Imaging Plain films may be non-specific, but may show free air or portal venous gas later in the course. Angiography Arterial thrombosis- often seen right at the takeoff of the celiac or SMA from the aorta. Arterial embolism- typically an occlusion of the celiac or SMA at a branch (versus right at the takeoff). Treatment Volume resuscitation, antibiotics Anticoagulation Surgery consultation for assessment of bowel viability and treatment of vessel occlusion Previous Next
- Accessing the Right Information | Doc on the Run
Confessions of an ICU Physician with a terrible memory Accessing the Right Information < Back Confessions of an ICU Physician with a terrible memory Training in medicine starts with textbook learning. But the art of caring for patients can’t be learned in a textbook. Higher-order thinking is essential to understand the interaction between multiple conflicting disease processes, identify nuisances of atypical presentations and find solutions for clinical conundrums. As the field of medicine grows exponentially, the volume of information is too much for one person to keep track of. I find that understanding clinical concepts is much easier than rote memorization of pharmaceutical brand names with their associated generic name, recalling the dose of a paralytic, or identifying the ideal antibiotic for a multi-drug resistant bacteria. After several years of learning and studying mechanical ventilation and how it interacts with and affects a patient's respiratory physiology, I now understand the principles of how to optimize oxygenation and ventilation. As an ICU physician, I can't re-read the basic textbook of mechanical ventilation every time I care for a patient with respiratory failure. I must be able to make decisions relatively quickly and must be able to explain my rationale to residents and bedside nurses while we are working to manage a patient with severe lung disease. But I can pause to look up the recommended dosing of a medication for a patient on dialysis or identify the best anti-microbial for a particular bacteria or fungi. What do I do about important information that I need immediate access to but that doesn't reside in the forefront of my mind? Smartphones, with access to websites and applications , have revolutionized our ability to bring evidence-based medicine to the bedside. Clinical practice guidelines can be accessed on society websites. Deployed Medicine is a resource that provides access to Tactical Combat Casualty Care and Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guidelines. There are apps for a wide number of clinical programs that were initially web-based, such as UpToDate. In addition to the resources that are openly available to the public, I have created a database of personal high-yield references. Medication dose ranges, CPGs for our trauma center, AAST Injury Scales, sedation/ pain scores, TEG parameters, and a wide variety of other information that I refer to on a relatively routine basis are now in the palm of my hand. I use the Trello app. I created a dedicated workspace with a group of lists (titles such as trauma, medication, ICU, etc) which each contain multiple individual cards (titles such as A-F bundle, CAM-ICU/ RASS/ CPOT, TEG). I'm not saying you have to use this. But I highly recommend finding a tool that works for you. TL;DR • Take the time to understand processes and concepts- learn one physiology concept from each pt • Have an external tool for storing “rote memorization” facts that you can readily access Previous Next
- Blood Shortage | Doc on the Run
Life and Death Decisions in a Resource-Constrained Environment Blood Shortage < Back Life and Death Decisions in a Resource-Constrained Environment When resources aren't in short supply, patient care isn’t limited by access to resources. As we quickly noticed at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, nationwide supply shortages can develop quickly. In addition to the continuously growing staff and supply shortage the nation is currently enduring, we now have a critical shortage of blood products. The categories of patients who receive blood transfusions are diverse, and my colleagues and I use this resource daily. So I'm going to ask the uncomfortable question. Have you ever been in a resource-limited environment where you were unable to provide every patient with the same level of care? Have you ever been in a difficult position to allocate supplies and medical care based on triage? And most recently, have you been forced to re-evaluate your transfusion practice in light of this severe blood shortage? Several months ago I had a tragic case of a young male who suffered penetrating abdominal and pelvic trauma. He had multiple injuries to his IVC, his right iliac as well as hollow viscus injuries. I had another trauma attending, a trauma fellow, and a chief resident in the operating room. We were simultaneously working in multiple body cavities. Initially, I was holding manual proximal aortic control at the diaphragmatic hiatus. This was modified to transthoracic aortic cross-clamp, which also permitted open cardiac massage. Unfortunately, despite 4 educated pairs of hands, the patient remained hemodynamically tenuous. We cross-clamped the aorta and continued aggressive blood product resuscitation. I lost track of how many products he received, but it was likely one of the highest volumes I've ever given a patient. I'm a young staff surgeon, and this was the first case where I was faced with the ethical dilemma of withholding further transfusion in the setting of surgical futility. He had injuries that we were working to control, and in isolation, each injury was easily survivable. However, he sustained a constellation of symptoms too severe to tolerate. Whenever the thoracic aortic cross-clamp was released, he became profoundly unstable. Inability to tolerate the removal of cross-clamp is incompatible with life. No one wants to be seen as giving up, admitting failure, or abandoning a patient. As I gain more experience, I become increasingly comfortable with uncomfortable situations. In the back of my mind, as each minute passed, I became progressively more cognizant of the fact that the patient's mortality was inevitable. I didn't verbalize this until much later in the case. But at one point in the case, when I heard the number of units of blood transfused, my sense that the patient was unlikely to survive became overwhelming. I was grateful to have a colleague with me to openly discuss the conflict of continuing to administer blood products in a patient with essentially 100% mortality. We are charged with caring for patients with the same level of care, indiscriminately- not withholding interventions based on our judgments of a patient's worthiness. Blood products are an extremely precious and limited resource, and shouldn't be used without thoughtful consideration. Verbalizing that continuing resuscitative efforts while a patient is still alive is not without consequence. There are people in the room who don’t have the same experience, who don’t understand that even though we can continue to fix injuries, further use of blood products would not help the patient. By extension, there could be a patient who needed blood to save their love who could be deprived access to that resource. It takes experience to make these difficult calls. So how do you gain this wisdom and how do you handle these situations? - You only gain this wisdom through experience. It can’t be taught, it can only be learned by facing similar situations. - Remember you're not working in isolation. You don’t have to make the decision alone. Enlist the support of colleagues and senior partners. - Verbalize your thoughts- this makes others in the room aware of the current clinical situation. This also can empower team members to offer suggestions. In challenging clinical situations, I commonly say "does anyone else have any ideas". Some teammates do not feel comfortable speaking up in a room of physicians/ surgeons, so this can open the floor for a frank discussion. Previous Next
- What is ACS? What happens in the trauma bay? | Doc on the Run
< Back What happens in the trauma bay? A glimpse into the inner workings of a trauma activation The radio crackles and the paramedic's voice cuts through the din of the emergency department. “Doctor to the radio”. The clock already started and time isn’t on our side. “30s-year-old male, a gunshot wound to the right arm and left back. GCS 7. Highest heart rate 110, lowest blood pressure 80 systolic. 5 minutes out.” The management of trauma starts at the time of injury, with bystanders and dispatched first responders. Immediate interventions can be performed on the scene, which is followed by rapid transport to the hospital. En route, care continues to be delivered as needed (starting IV, giving fluids/ blood, maintain an open airway, etc). The hospital is contacted to prepare them for an incoming patient. Key details dictate the resources that are mobilized in response. There are no universal criteria for what constitutes each level of trauma activation, and different hospitals have unique designations for the highest activation (Trauma Red, Level 1, Code 1, etc). However, triage is designed to rapidly transport the patient to the most appropriate facility. An adult trauma code 1 is paged out to the trauma team. As the team arrives, the minutes before the patient arrives are spent relaying key patient details shared from the pre-hospital team. For a hypotensive patient or report of massive bleeding, massive transfusion is initiated. Chest trauma? Chest tubes, possibly open thoracotomy tray. Extremity wounds? Check that the tourniquets are ready. Team roles are assigned, and a plan is discussed. When the patient arrives, the pre-hospital team presents key data to the entire team. At one of the facilities I trained, there was a standardized presentation. It was organized, succinct, and appropriately relevant; the trauma team and the pre-hospital team both knew what information was to be shared. Pre-hospital team report Age (or approximate age), gender, mechanism, time of injury, significant event details (prolonged extrication, death on the scene, etc). Significant pre-hospital interventions and events (tourniquet time and location, intubation, change in mental status). Presence of IV access (size and location) and administration of pre-hospital fluids or medications. Highest heart rate, lowest blood pressure. Trauma Evaluation/ ATLS After the report, the patient is transferred to the bed and the primary and secondary surveys are performed. Primary survey- assess airway patency, adequacy of breathing (bilateral breath sounds, chest rise and fall), circulation (control active hemorrhage, assess pulses), disability (rapid neurologic assessment with GCS and pupil exam), and exposure (remove clothing to facilitate exam, make sure they get covered with blankets to minimize hypothermia). Concurrent with the primary survey, IV access is obtained, blood is drawn, and interventions are performed based on the findings of the survey. If there are no immediate life-threatening injuries on the primary survey, the secondary survey is performed, which is a comprehensive head to toe exam (see below), including log rolling the patient to examine their back. Common diagnostic testing includes commonly, patients undergo FAST (see vignette "Blast Injury "), chest x-ray, and pelvis x-ray. Based on hemodynamic stability and injuries, patients are then dispositioned to the operating room, radiology for further imaging, admitted to the ICU or floor for ongoing resuscitation, observation, consults, serial exams, etc. Secondary Survey Head/ ears/ nose/ throat- facial abrasions/ ecchymosis/ tenderness, periorbital edema/ ecchymosis, crepitus, open wounds, blood from nares/ ears. Tympanic membrane. Jaw occlusion. Neck- c-collar in place, obvious ecchymosis, abrasions, open wounds, tenderness. Chest- wounds, ecchymosis, tenderness, crepitus. Axilla- wounds. Abdomen- wounds, ecchymosis, tenderness Pelvis- stability, pain. Back- midline spinal tenderness/ step-off, ecchymosis, abrasions, wounds. Rectal- tone, blood on rectal exam. Extremities- sensation/ motor strength. Abrasions, wounds, gross deformities Vascular- carotid, femoral, DP/PT, radial pulses bilaterally. GU- perineal ecchymosis or wounds, blood at meatus. Previous Next




